BOINC@AUSTRALIA FORUM
November 14, 2019, 07:36:11 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: BOINC@AUSTRALIA has a facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/groups/7742313626/
Come on by and have a look.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ATI vs nVidia..  (Read 4250 times)
veebee
Super Hero
****

Aussie Karma: +1151/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4358


Tempo - Son of Bach....Supreme Ch & Aus No 1 !!!


« on: April 07, 2009, 06:28:54 AM »

Is one card more "efficient" than the other here at F@H ?

My sons computer has an ATI 4370 (I think - will check the number) and is literally (compared to mine) flying along..   Thumbs Up

I have F@H running on two comps with nVidia cards, 1 x 9500 and 1 x 7600.

The 9500 just finished its first WU , taking nearly 3 days ! and the 7600 which started at roughly the same time is around 50% done ....  Thumb Down

maybe his are doing different types of WU's ... I dont know... will try to have a good look today, as I have a cpl "old" radeon cards I may well "swap back in" if they're gonna be that much faster !

EDIT: the 9500's WU it just finished, was "500,000 steps" and took nearly three days.... the new one it just downloaded... is "1,5000,000 steps"... is that three times the size/ length ..??
« Last Edit: April 07, 2009, 06:32:12 AM by veebee » Logged


 


i7-920 @ 3.4 Ghz - 12 GB DDR3 1333 -  GTX 660Ti + ATI HD 7950

Alienware i7- 2670QM @ 2.20 GHz  - GT555M



AA 3 to AA 31
yoda
Guest
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2009, 02:20:45 AM »

Sounds like you're on your own here Veebee.  I have only run FAH on CPUs so don't know.  But maybe there are some answers on the FAH message boards?

Bear in mind that the 9500GT and 9600GT are relatively low spec cards (32 and 64 shaders respectively).  Not sure how an ATI 4370 compares to those two

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.032 seconds with 17 queries.